“Busting Creatine Myths: Separating Fact From Fiction” What Do 2.2M Viewers Really Think?

A 993-Comment Analysis on the Renaissance Periodization YouTube Channel

Device frame

What the Comments Reveal (Beyond Views & Likes)

2.2M views and 68K likes on “Busting Creatine Myths: Separating Fact From Fiction” from Renaissance Periodization. As of 2025-09-19, the video had 4,541 total comments, and this analysis draws from a sample of 993. Beyond the surface metrics, we analyze what truly engaged viewers are saying.

Views
2,200,000
Likes
68,000
Total Comments
4,541
Sample Analyzed
993

Sentiment Snapshot

Neutral and positive reactions were equally strong, though over one in four viewers expressed negative concerns.

Positive
36.33%
Neutral
36.33%
Negative
26.14%
Sentiment Breakdown

Emotional Pulse: Curious Leads the Way

curious 27.07% concerned 17.43% frustrated 13.84% amused 11.74% worried 7.66%

Curiosity drives much of the discussion, though concern and frustration highlight ongoing uncertainty about health and usage. Amusement and worry also play meaningful roles in shaping tone.

Comment Breakdown: Personal Stories and Questions Dominate

📖 personal story 35.19% ❓ question 33.18% 👍 engagement 8.46% 🌟 compliment 8.35% 😕 complaint 7.80%

The mix blends stories, direct questions, surface reactions, compliments, and some dissatisfaction, creating a broad spectrum of engagement.

Mike Israetel’s Engagement in the Comments

No replies or reactions were recorded, meaning engagement odds were effectively zero for viewers leaving comments.

Replied
0.00%
Hearted
0.00%
Any Interaction
0.00%

Burning Questions

Viewers want clarity on who should and should not use creatine. Concerns spanned kidney disease, blood pressure medications, rare conditions, and questions from younger users and women. Hair loss and water retention remain common worries.

On the practical side, people debated dosing strategies, hydration, splitting doses, and product comparisons. There was also interest in non-responders, brain benefits, and whether creatine fits special diets or fasting windows.

Feedback and Critiques

Many viewers endorsed creatine as safe and effective, praising the myth-busting and straightforward dosing advice. Warm water for solubility and hydration practices were recurring tips.

Some criticisms centered on lab interpretation, particularly creatinine and eGFR confusion, and debates over dosing approaches. Requests for clearer guidance on coffee, acidity, and product quality also emerged.

High Praise

Viewers highlighted the clear, concise delivery that cut through confusion. They valued humor blended with professionalism, noting that advice was both digestible and trustworthy.

Several reported adjusting routines based on the video, building confidence in their creatine use, and even crediting the channel with broader progress in fitness journeys.

Opportunities for Future Content

  1. Creatine and your kidney labs: why creatinine goes up, eGFR pitfalls, better tests, and how to brief your doctor
  2. Who shouldn’t take creatine? Screening and monitoring guide for at-risk groups
  3. Dosing that actually works: loading vs daily, hydration targets, strength ranges, and addressing non-responders
  4. How to take creatine without side effects: mixing, timing, GI troubleshooting, and hydration
  5. Creatine buyer’s guide: forms, certifications, cost-per-gram math, and navigating quality
  6. Creatine beyond the gym: cognitive and nerve benefits, clinical conditions, and higher-dose considerations

Wrapping Up

This video delivered clarity and humor while tackling misconceptions. Strong curiosity and practical needs show that more personalized dosing, medical safety caveats, and product guidance could elevate trust and utility. Shono AI amplifies these signals so creators can address what matters most to their audience.

About This Analysis

Scope
Single video deep-dive
Video Title
Busting Creatine Myths: Separating Fact From Fiction
Video URL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFg16I_iJyA
Channel Name
Renaissance Periodization
Channel URL
https://www.youtube.com/@RenaissancePeriodization
Creator Name
Mike Israetel
Views
2,200,000 (as of 2025-09-19)
Likes
68,000 (as of 2025-09-19)
Likes/Views Ratio
3.09%
Data Window
As of 2025-09-19 (for comment analysis)
Total Comments
4,541
Sample Analyzed
993
Tool
Shono AI

Methodology & Limits

The analysis covers 993 sampled comments out of 4,541. Duplicates and spam were removed, and AI classification was used for sentiment, emotions, and comment type aggregation.

Engagement rates reflect the sampled set only. Snapshot as of 2025-09-19; values may shift as new comments arrive.

Suggest a Video for Comment Analysis and Review

Give Viewers a Voice Over Algorithms! Share your favorite viral videos, or even ones you think are overrated, for comment analysis.

Note: Before sharing any link with us, please ensure the video has at least 500 comments for our AI to analyze effectively.
Built on Unicorn Platform