What the Comments Reveal (Beyond Views & Likes)
2.8M views and 90K likes on “How Long Does It Take To Reverse Insulin Resistance?” from Dr. Sten Ekberg as of 2025-09-26, with 3,907 total comments and a 1,000-comment sample analyzed — we analyze engaged viewers.
Sentiment Snapshot
The audience leaned strongly positive, with most praising clarity and practical guidance while some expressed concerns or lingering questions.
Emotional Pulse: Grateful Leads the Way
Viewers mostly expressed gratitude and curiosity, showing they not only valued the insights but also wanted deeper understanding and reassurance.
Comment Breakdown: Personal Stories and Compliments Dominate
A mix of heartfelt stories, direct questions, and compliments shows both engagement and trust from the audience.
Sten Ekberg’s Engagement in the Comments
Roughly 1 in 20 comments received a reply or reaction. This suggests room for building stronger community trust through more direct interaction.
Burning Questions
Viewers want clarity on why blood sugar can rise without eating, whether avoiding sugar means cutting all carbs, and which lab tests best track insulin resistance. Many seek practical roadmaps: safe carb reduction on medication, fasting and refeeding strategies, and how to fuel exercise without sugar. Complex cases—menopause, long COVID, autoimmunity, and age—highlight demand for tailored advice.
They also pressed on timelines: how long it takes to reverse resistance, how severity or insulin use affects outcomes, and whether steady effort continues improving metrics. Food details mattered—what counts as safe carbs or sweeteners, whether small amounts of fruit or dark chocolate fit, and if protein-driven gluconeogenesis or OMAD thresholds affect results. Plateaus, mixed lab signals, and comorbidities rounded out the concerns.
Feedback and Critiques
Viewers widely praised the clear, principle-first teaching style, saying it helped them understand insulin resistance without fear-mongering. They valued options across diets and lifestyle levers, finding it motivating and adaptable to personal contexts.
Critiques centered on length and pacing, with requests for tighter edits, recaps, and clearer food examples. Some wanted more emphasis on weight loss, fiber-rich foods, plant-based options, and practical trade-offs like fat intake when losing weight. Captions and accessibility also surfaced as improvements.
High Praise
Viewers consistently described Dr. Ekberg as a gifted teacher who makes complex metabolic science accessible. They admired his balance of rigor and encouragement, noting how his explanations built confidence and actionable knowledge.
Many shared real-life outcomes—weight loss, diabetes control, and renewed motivation—attributing progress to his clarity and consistency. His content was seen as comprehensive, compassionate, and trustworthy across diverse audiences.
Opportunities for Future Content
- Where does insulin go? Explaining insulin’s lifespan, clearance, and myths about buildup.
- Why blood sugar rises when you haven’t eaten, plus strategies to tame spikes.
- Carb clarity and safe reintroduction, including post-fast eating and transitions.
- Tests that matter for tracking insulin resistance and realistic timelines.
- Tailored strategies for complex cases: menopause, autoimmunity, hypoglycemia, long COVID.
- Comparing diet pathways—keto, carnivore, Mediterranean, plant-forward—without dogma.
Wrapping Up
This video’s strength lies in clarity, compassion, and evidence-based options. Personalization, tighter pacing, and practical examples can amplify impact. Shono AI highlights these audience signals, turning feedback into a roadmap for deeper trust and engagement.
About This Analysis
Methodology & Limits
1,000 comments were sampled out of 3,907 total, with duplicates and spam removed. AI classified comments by sentiment, emotion, and type, then aggregated the results.
Engagement rates reflect the sampled set only. Snapshot as of 2025-09-26; values may shift as new comments arrive.
