What the Comments Reveal (Beyond Views & Likes)
304K views and 10K likes — “The Risks of Getting a Tattoo & What They Do to the Skin” by the Institute of Human Anatomy (Jeremy Jones and Jonathan Bennion). As of October 15 2025, the video had 859 total comments, with 340 analyzed here. Beyond views and likes, we analyze what truly engaged viewers are saying.
Sentiment Snapshot
The conversation is fairly split, with slightly more positive sentiment but a notable amount of critical or concerned tones, showing a balanced yet questioning audience.
Emotional Pulse: Curiosity Leads the Way
Viewers express a mix of curiosity and critique — they’re intrigued by tattoo science but remain wary about health risks. Gratitude and amusement show that education and entertainment go hand in hand here.
Comment Breakdown: Personal Stories and Questions Dominate
The mix combines stories and technical questions with a fair share of complaints and praise — showing viewers’ personal investment and the video’s reach into real experiences.
Jeremy Jones & Jonathan Bennion’s Engagement in the Comments
Roughly 1 in 13 commenters received a direct interaction. This shows moderate engagement — enough to acknowledge viewers but still room for more active dialogue on safety concerns.
Burning Questions
Viewers are deeply concerned about long-term tattoo safety — from cancer and autoimmune risks to pigment toxicity and lymph node migration. Many asked about ink composition, color-specific reactions, and the science of how tattoos interact with the immune system.
Others sought clarity on real-world scenarios: MRI safety, IV insertion through tattooed skin, and whether laser removal can cause more harm than good. Curiosity even extended to taboo or high-risk trends like eyeball tattoos, cremation ashes in ink, and home kits, reflecting a hunger for authoritative, evidence-based answers.
Feedback and Critiques
Viewers largely appreciated the clarity and cautionary tone, calling the explainer “eye-opening” and practical. Many said it helped them evaluate tattoo safety more thoughtfully or even reconsider getting one altogether.
However, several requested deeper dives into ink regulation, laser removal risks, and evidence sources. Some felt key topics like metal toxicity and MRI reactions needed more depth, while others debated whether the risks were overstated. The overall tone remained inquisitive and constructive, not dismissive.
High Praise
Viewers repeatedly described the video as educational, comprehensive, and engaging. Many thanked the creators for simplifying complex medical information and making anatomy approachable.
Loyal followers praised the team’s consistency and clarity, noting they’ve been learning from the channel for years. The comments show enduring trust and appreciation for its teaching quality and balanced tone.
Opportunities for Future Content
- Tattoo removal, demystified: real risks (including cancer concerns), outcomes, costs, and how to choose a safe laser provider.
- How to get a safe tattoo: a pre-appointment checklist, shop hygiene standards, artist questions, and aftercare that actually prevents infection.
- Tattoos and your health history: guidance for autoimmune conditions, lymph nodes/lymphedema, imaging (MRI/CT), IV access, and tattooing over moles.
- What’s in the ink: pigment chemistry, heavy metals, allergy risks by color, granulomas, and how the body processes and stores ink long term.
- High-risk trends and myths: ashes mixed into ink, eyelid/UV/white ink, DIY kits—what’s safe, what’s not, and the evidence behind each.
- Beyond tattoos—an evidence-based body-mod safety series: piercings, Botox, and breast implants (risks, complications, and how to minimize them).
Wrapping Up
The video successfully builds trust through education and clarity, yet the audience’s persistent questions reveal strong demand for more in-depth, science-driven follow-ups. Shono AI helps uncover these exact audience signals — guiding creators toward the next conversation their viewers are already waiting for.
About This Analysis
Methodology & Limits
340 comments were analyzed out of 859 total, with duplicates and spam removed. AI models classified each by sentiment, emotion, and comment type, then aggregated the data into insights.
Engagement rates reflect the sampled set only. Snapshot as of October 15 2025; values may shift as new comments arrive.
