What the Comments Reveal (Beyond Views & Likes)
2.2M views and 81K likes on “How To Use CREATINE To Build Muscle: Loading, Timing & Hair Loss? (Science Explained)” from Jeff Nippard as of 2025-09-19. The video drew 2,774 comments, of which 985 were analyzed, giving us a clear look into how engaged viewers really feel and what they still want to know.
Sentiment Snapshot
The audience leaned positive, though many comments stayed neutral while a smaller share raised concerns or critiques.
Emotional Pulse: Curious Leads the Way
Curiosity dominates, reflecting a strong demand for practical dosing clarity. Gratitude and admiration highlight trust in the creator, while concern signals ongoing safety questions.
Comment Breakdown: Questions and Compliments Dominate
The mix reflects a high volume of direct questions and praise, with meaningful stories, some complaints, and lighter engagement reactions rounding it out.
Jeff Nippard’s Engagement in the Comments
Roughly 1 in 75 comments received a heart, with no direct replies. Interaction overall was limited, suggesting an opportunity to connect more directly.
Burning Questions
Viewers are pressing for exact dosing guidance, especially scaling by weight and accounting for creatine in pre-workouts or gainers. Many want clarity on loading versus daily maintenance, training-day versus rest-day dosing, and whether more than 5 grams makes sense for larger individuals.
Safety concerns also surface: kidney health, long-term adaptation, and side effects like hair loss or digestion issues. Special cases such as teenagers, women, and those cutting weight frequently appear, along with questions about stacking, timing, and solubility tricks.
Feedback and Critiques
Many applauded the clarity, research-backed framing, and even medical endorsements of the video. Practical tips about dosing and mixing resonated, and production quality was praised for pacing and clean editing.
The main critique focused on the sponsorship tie-in with finasteride, which some saw as conflicting with the creatine hair-loss discussion. Others called for stronger warnings about side effects, more attention to women’s needs, and corrections on technical details. These highlight the value of transparency and balance in addressing sensitive issues.
High Praise
Viewers repeatedly called this the best creatine video on YouTube, commending its thoroughness, neutrality, and evidence-based approach. Many said it answered every question they had and subscribed on the spot.
Production quality also drew admiration, with smooth pacing, concise delivery, and polished visuals. The trust built through science-forward explanations positions the channel as a reliable, benchmark source for fitness content.
Opportunities for Future Content
- The Personalized Creatine Blueprint: exact doses by bodyweight, training frequency, and what is already in pre/protein/gainer plus a simple calculator
- Creatine Safety Deep-Dive: kidneys, cycling, hair loss/DHT, sex drive, teens vs adults, IBS, hydration, caffeine interactions, who should avoid or monitor
- Creatine Stack & Shopping Guide: forms, vegan/synthetic options, brand quality, cost-per-gram, counting label claims to avoid overdosing
- Timing That Actually Matters: daily vs training-day, rest days, pre vs post, two-a-day, solubility tricks, pairing with protein/carbs
- Creatine While Cutting: manage water weight, set physique expectations, dosing to support fat loss
- Stronger After 40: evidence-based training, diet, and supplementation including creatine use, recovery and sleep strategies
Wrapping Up
This video earned trust with clarity and science, while highlighting areas where deeper engagement and more transparent discussion could strengthen community ties. Shono AI helps surface these signals so creators can refine their connection with the audience and address what truly matters to them.
About This Analysis
Methodology & Limits
The analysis covers 985 sampled comments out of 2,774. Duplicates and spam were removed, and AI classification was used for sentiment, emotions, and comment type aggregation.
Engagement rates reflect the sampled set only. Snapshot as of 2025-09-19; values may shift as new comments arrive.
